20086Oct
Category:
Features |
There’s a new film out this week by the outspoken, atheist, ultra-liberal host of HBO’s The Bill Maher Show. It’s called Religulous. I have not seen the film yet.
I do occasionally catch his rant-filled show because, I confess, he can be very funny. His “New Rules” may be the funniest 5 minutes on cable. However, his audience and guests are almost always of the same mindset and in agreement on all the political discussion topics. My favorite moments are when an outnumbered conservative or Christian guest sits at the table. They are usually articulate, intellectual, informed and interesting, to the annoyance of the others.
One great moment was when rapper Will.I.Am was on the show. Will is of course a wealthy, left-wing Hollywood liberal, wearing a hat too small for his head, and jumping in on the discussion when he thought he had something deep to say. Bill started into his usual religious intolerance comments, sounding like Obama during his “clinging to guns and religion” speech. Will jumped in with a “wait a minute, my Momma goes to church every Sunday and she made me who I am. I would not be here if it wasn’t for God”. Bill wrote him off as just being lucky.
So now this former stand-up comedian makes a movie called “Religulous”. He travels the world to mock religious leaders and regular people of faith - Catholics and Jews, Protestants and Muslims, Raelians and Mormons. Just reading some of the reviews helps me know exactly what this film is about and whether I should save my money.
Some quotes from those who enjoyed the movie:
“…an interesting and funny film by a man full of doubt. Had he been a bit more open-minded, he might see belief and doubt are partners, not opposites.”
“Atheists should find it good for an easy laugh.”
“…I enjoyed Religulous, but I think it would be better if Maher had the confidence to spend more time talking to articulate believers.”
“Was Maher afraid he might muddy his clownish jape if he actually brought into the mix a learned theologian?”
“A film that’s hardly profound–one that’s unlikely to alter your views on religion, whatever choir you’re in.”
And from those who disliked it:
“It’s meant to “prove” that religious belief and intelligence are mutually exclusive. If you believe that, this movie is for you. For everyone else, it’s a trifling and shoddy tirade.”
“In the end, for all its genuflections towards free inquiry and rational debate, Maher is as close-minded as any of the preachers he despises.”
“Religulous doesn’t really go anywhere. It’s ultimately a celebration of the old-time religion we call entertainment.”
So, after building a career on Atheism, this is the best he could come up with? He either went into this project half-heartedly, which would discount his entire career, or he really just doesn’t get it, and even he doesn’t believe his own disbelief.
The final scene I hear is a long-winded monologue about the dangers and absurdity of religion. Why would anyone pay to hear someone’s opinion for entertainment purposes? Especially one that his fans have all heard before. If you’re a believer and you go to this film, just remember, he doesn’t care if you denounce your faith. He is looking at box office receipts.
Aside from a few movie critics who get paid to watch this, his audience will most likely consist of his own choir.